Wednesday, September 23, 2026

From my FB page - Today's musing minute following Yom Kippur - on atonement and ethical behavior

Today’s musing minute – Yom Kippur and the meaning of atonement and repentance.

This Yom Kippur, like all those before, I fasted for 24 hours. I am not sure why I do it. Its just that it is such a powerful tradition among Jews everywhere – even for non-believers (in the usual sense) like me.

It is a powerful day, going back centuries. The fasting is almost incidental. It serves to focus the mind on our mortality (always a preoccupation of all humans), to face it, and to try to come to terms with it. In addition, it is a day of remembrance. Remembrance of catastrophe and death, from the time of the first temple, through the inquisition, the holocaust until, now added, the horror of October 7, 2023 to the present. Some of it recited in detail. It is a sad, sad day. But we must not forget.

We also acknowledge that the future is unknowable and that the next year will decide “who shall live and who shall die” and how.

And then there is the question of atonement and repentance for our sins. (Yom Kippur means Day of Attonement). It is an exploration in introspective morality. Couched in collective terms, “we”, perhaps to remind us we are not alone in our transgressions.

But the most interesting thing for me on this particular day, came from one part of our rabbi’s sermon, near the beginning. I have known him fondly for many years and we share a common interest in political economy broadly understood.

The Torah portion for the day was “after the death” (acharei mot) – this refers to the death of Aaron’s two sons, for apparently violating a vital restriction in the ritual sacrifice in the temple. The portion deals in great detail about the animal sacrifices in the days of the first temple, circa 996 BCE. It has a distinctly ancient (primitive) feel to it – the idea of expiating our sins via the sacrifice of an innocent animal. It is, incidentally, the origin of the idea of the scapegoat. One of two goats is sacrificed and the other is sent away, the scapegoat.

Now my rabbi points out that this portion is in stark contrast to the Haftorah, the accompanying reading from the Prophets, in this case from the book of Isiah. It is written at least three centuries after the Torah portion, during which time the ancient Israelites had live in the old kingdom (or possibly in the returned kingdon after the Babylonian exile). Typical of the prophetic writings, it does not address ritual whorship, but, rather, it addresses social (implying individual) behavior. Isiah provides a strident attack on the hypocrisy of the ritualisitc self righteous.

“Is this the fast I desire,
a day for people to starve their bodies?
Is it bowing the head like a bulrush
and lying in sackcloth and ashes?
Do you call that a fast,
a day when the LORD is favorable?

No, this is the fast I desire:
to unlock the fetters of wickedness,
to let the oppressed go free;
to break off every yoke.

It is to share your bread with the hungry,
and to take the wretched poor into your home;
when you see the naked, to clothe them,
and not to ignore your own kin.”

It is from these types of pronouncements that we move from magical ritual enactment to the concreteness of human actions. Judaism is nothing if not a deeply ethical religion, concerned with appropriate behavior toward others, all others. But one can also see how the Prophets can provide support for notions of social engineering – for socialists and theocrats.

For me it is important to notice that Isiah and the prophets are not recommending top down social design, but rather appealling to the individual consciences of people. Repentance is not so much about God’s forgiveness, but about the forgiveness between ourselve and the resolve to do better.

Tuesday, September 8, 2026

From my FB page - The ethics of Neo-classical Economics.

 Today’s musing minute.

Classical Liberalism and the Subjectivism of Value. Two concepts that are logically orthoganol, but practically very connected.
Although perhaps insufficiently emphasized, the subjectivism of value is fundamental to an understanding of all aspects of economics, and many mistakes get made by not realizing its implications. It is the cornerstone of the marginal revolution and the birth of neoclassical economics. The value of anything is in the mind of the valuer and not in the thing. Value is better thought of as a verb, and not to be confused with price.
Value then, in itself, cannot be measured any more than an emotion can, though the physical manifestation of its experience can be observed. Different individuals have incomperable value scales, and often value things differently. That is economics.
Consider ethics, a classical liberal considers all individuals to be free to form his own opinion concerning values, of things or of actions and restrictions. The most obvious manifestation of the enemies of classical liberalism, on the left and on the right, is the implicit or explicit denial of that ethic. They consdier themselves priviledged to override the preferred choices of individuals whose values of things and actions they do not agree with.
See less